FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO
FCCD.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF) and LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Dividend funds. FCCD.TO is passively managed, while LLYH.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, FCCD.TO returned 32.15% vs 39.69% for LLYH.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCCD.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LLYH.TO.
Performance
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCCD.TO achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly higher than LLYH.TO's 3.76% return.
FCCD.TO
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 14.15%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- —
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 14.15% | 25.05% | 5.07% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 3.76% | 24.63% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCCD.TO and LLYH.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FCCD.TO
LLYH.TO
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCCD.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.25 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.70 | 1.90 | +3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.08 | 5.21 | +21.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCCD.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87 | 1.21 | +2.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.24 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCCD.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.53%, which is greater than LLYH.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCCD.TO and LLYH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCCD.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.53% | -31.00% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | -20.97% | +15.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -2.39% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -10.18% | +3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 7.64% | -6.45% |
Volatility
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF (FCCD.TO) is 2.54%, while Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that FCCD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLYH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCCD.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 6.85% | -4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 24.78% | -17.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.37% | 33.04% | -24.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 33.82% | -22.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 33.82% | -16.71% |
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCCD.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LLYH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCCD.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Dividend Comparison
FCCD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, less than LLYH.TO's 17.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCCD.TO Fidelity Canadian High Dividend Index ETF | 2.97% | 3.56% | 4.27% | 4.65% | 4.01% | 3.02% | 4.74% | 3.80% | 0.47% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.81% | 17.54% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCCD.TO and LLYH.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FCCD.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FCCD.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LLYH.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FCCD.TO and 0.40% for LLYH.TO.
Find the right allocation for FCCD.TO and LLYH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer