FCBYX vs. ESIIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCBYX (Nuveen Strategic Income Fund) and ESIIX (Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FCBYX returned 4.27%/yr vs 5.20%/yr for ESIIX. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCBYX charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ESIIX.

Performance

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBYX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than ESIIX's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBYX has underperformed ESIIX with an annualized return of 4.27%, while ESIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.20% annualized return.

FCBYX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 7.40%
• 5Y*: 2.94%
• 10Y*: 4.27%

ESIIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 2.18%
• 6M: 2.83%
• 1Y: 9.72%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: 5.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund	0.96%	8.55%	6.86%	9.14%	-10.36%	1.47%	8.45%	13.18%	-3.07%	5.54%
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	2.18%	12.46%	6.66%	8.52%	-2.32%	1.59%	7.80%	7.65%	-2.44%	5.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBYX and ESIIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009	0.39

Over the past year, FCBYX and ESIIX have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.39, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FCBYX vs. ESIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBYX

FCBYX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FCBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FCBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FCBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ESIIX

ESIIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
ESIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ESIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ESIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ESIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCBYX	ESIIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	3.61	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	5.41	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.83	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	4.21	-1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.66	16.19	-6.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is lower than the ESIIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBYX and ESIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCBYX	ESIIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	3.61	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	1.68	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.02	1.65	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.46	+0.62

Drawdowns

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBYX drawdown since its inception was -24.49%, smaller than the maximum ESIIX drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBYX and ESIIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCBYX	ESIIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.49%	-26.87%	+2.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.39%	-2.44%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.75%	-2.46%	-2.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.74%	-6.18%	-9.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.93%	-12.25%	-3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.55%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-4.72%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	0.63%	+0.08%

Volatility

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I (ESIIX) have volatilities of 1.02% and 1.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCBYX	ESIIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	1.04%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.06%	2.22%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82%	2.84%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.13%	3.19%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.22%	3.17%	+1.05%

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBYX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIIX's 1.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCBYX vs. ESIIX - Dividend Comparison

FCBYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, less than ESIIX's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESIIX Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund Class I	7.39%	7.01%	7.23%	7.19%	5.82%	4.57%	4.44%	5.29%	4.25%	3.95%	4.18%	4.59%
FCBYX Nuveen Strategic Income Fund	5.39%	6.22%	6.44%	5.59%	4.71%	3.08%	3.58%	3.69%	3.91%	4.92%	5.28%	5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCBYX and ESIIX in my portfolio?

FCBYX and ESIIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCBYX or ESIIX?

ESIIX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to FCBYX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBYX dropped -24.49% vs ESIIX's -26.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.