PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBTX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBTX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 9.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBTX has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 2.36%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.


FCBTX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.91%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.30%
1Y
5.93%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
2.36%

FSPSX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.51%
6M
12.14%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCBTX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M
0.50%7.48%2.16%8.07%-17.35%-1.88%10.41%14.02%-2.98%6.37%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.51%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBTX and FSPSX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.02

Over the past year, FCBTX and FSPSX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBTX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBTX
FCBTX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FCBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCBTXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.91

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

7.16

-1.30

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBTX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCBTXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.47

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.56

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.57

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.50

+0.14

Drawdowns

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBTX drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBTX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBTXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.60%

-33.69%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-11.39%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.66%

-13.58%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-29.41%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.60%

-33.69%

+10.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-0.45%

-2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-6.55%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

3.03%

-2.00%

Volatility

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) is 1.48%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that FCBTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBTXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

4.62%

-3.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.21%

12.04%

-8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

14.80%

-10.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

15.98%

-9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

16.56%

-10.61%

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBTX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FCBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than FSPSX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCBTX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M
3.88%3.76%3.30%3.10%2.23%2.53%3.04%2.89%3.21%2.74%3.09%2.62%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.88%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBTX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPSX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to FCBTX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBTX dropped -23.60% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBTX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer