FCBTX vs. FSPSX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FCBTX (Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M) and FSPSX (Fidelity International Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FCBTX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index. Over the past 10 years, FCBTX returned 1.94%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for FSPSX. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FCBTX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPSX.

Performance

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBTX achieves a -1.34% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBTX has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 1.94%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.

FCBTX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: -1.48%
• YTD: -1.34%
• 1Y: 1.01%
• 3Y*: 4.29%
• 5Y*: -0.95%
• 10Y*: 1.94%
• ALL TIME*: 3.36%

FSPSX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 1.28%
• 6M: 5.82%
• YTD: 11.79%
• 1Y: 25.41%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: 9.66%
• ALL TIME*: 8.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCBTX Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCBTX Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M	-1.34%	7.48%	2.16%	8.07%	-17.35%	-1.88%	10.41%	14.02%	-2.98%	6.37%
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	11.79%	31.98%	3.70%	18.31%	-14.23%	11.45%	8.16%	22.03%	-13.55%	25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBTX and FSPSX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2011	0.03

Over the past year, FCBTX and FSPSX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FCBTX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCBTX

FCBTX Risk / Return Rank: 9
FCBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
FCBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
FCBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FCBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FCBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

FSPSX

FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCBTX	FSPSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	1.65	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.62	2.34	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.30	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	2.24	-1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.43	8.48	-7.04

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBTX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBTX drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBTX and FSPSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCBTX	FSPSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-33.69%	+10.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-11.39%	+8.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.65%	-13.58%	+7.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.43%	-29.41%	+5.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.60%	-33.69%	+10.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.06%	-0.69%	-4.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.36%	-6.49%	+2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	3.00%	-1.76%

Volatility

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) is 1.05%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that FCBTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCBTX	FSPSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.05%	4.45%	-3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.33%	13.23%	-9.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.22%	15.50%	-11.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.69%	16.11%	-9.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.95%	16.29%	-10.34%

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBTX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCBTX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FCBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, more than FSPSX's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCBTX Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M	3.66%	3.76%	3.30%	3.10%	2.23%	2.53%	3.04%	2.89%	3.21%	2.74%	3.09%	2.62%
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund	2.82%	3.15%	3.27%	2.79%	2.66%	3.07%	1.84%	3.18%	2.79%	2.50%	3.08%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCBTX and FSPSX in my portfolio?

FCBTX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCBTX or FSPSX?

FSPSX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to FCBTX (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBTX dropped -23.60% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSPSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.