FCBTX vs. FIIFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FCBTX (Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M) and FIIFX (Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FCBTX returned 2.35%/yr vs 2.46%/yr for FIIFX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCBTX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FIIFX.

Performance

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund (FIIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBTX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than FIIFX's 0.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCBTX having a 2.35% annualized return and FIIFX not far ahead at 2.46%.

FCBTX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 5.93%
• 3Y*: 5.03%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: 2.35%

FIIFX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 0.76%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 4.81%
• 5Y*: 1.03%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCBTX Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M	0.41%	7.48%	2.16%	8.07%	-17.35%	-1.88%	10.41%	14.02%	-2.98%	6.37%
FIIFX Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund	0.18%	7.62%	3.20%	5.66%	-10.03%	-1.61%	7.58%	9.72%	-0.48%	4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBTX and FIIFX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2010	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FCBTX and FIIFX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCBTX vs. FIIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBTX

FCBTX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FCBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FCBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FCBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FCBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
FCBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

FIIFX

FIIFX Risk / Return Rank: 34
FIIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FIIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FIIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FIIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FIIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) and Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund (FIIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCBTX	FIIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.59	-0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.49	-0.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.33	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	2.16	-0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.90	7.57	-1.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the FIIFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBTX and FIIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCBTX	FIIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.29	1.59	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.24	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.65	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	1.07	-0.44

Drawdowns

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBTX drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, which is greater than FIIFX's maximum drawdown of -14.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBTX and FIIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCBTX	FIIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.60%	-14.85%	-8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-2.28%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.66%	-3.67%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.47%	-14.85%	-8.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.60%	-14.85%	-8.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.37%	-0.75%	-2.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.37%	-1.92%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	0.65%	+0.38%

Volatility

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M (FCBTX) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund (FIIFX) at 1.07%. This indicates that FCBTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCBTX	FIIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	1.07%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.21%	2.21%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.38%	3.11%	+1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.71%	4.29%	+2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.95%	3.82%	+2.13%

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBTX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than FIIFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCBTX vs. FIIFX - Dividend Comparison

FCBTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than FIIFX's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCBTX Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class M	3.89%	3.76%	3.30%	3.10%	2.23%	2.53%	3.04%	2.89%	3.21%	2.74%	3.09%	2.62%
FIIFX Federated Hermes Intermediate Corporate Bond Fund	4.26%	4.15%	3.39%	2.95%	1.97%	2.69%	2.64%	2.92%	4.02%	4.27%	3.30%	3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCBTX and FIIFX in my portfolio?

FCBTX and FIIFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCBTX or FIIFX?

FCBTX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to FIIFX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBTX dropped -23.60% vs FIIFX's -14.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.