FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L
FCBR.L (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FCBR.L tracks the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD while IUIT.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCBR.L returned 15.80%/yr vs 26.05%/yr for IUIT.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCBR.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FCBR.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCBR.L having a 25.54% return and IUIT.L slightly higher at 26.17%.
FCBR.L
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 29.92%
- YTD
- 25.54%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 22.18%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- —
IUIT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 16.60%
- YTD
- 26.17%
- 6M
- 24.49%
- 1Y
- 56.60%
- 3Y*
- 31.96%
- 5Y*
- 26.05%
- 10Y*
- 27.54%
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBR.L First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation | 25.54% | -0.06% | 20.93% | 33.00% | -18.86% | 21.41% | 27.00% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 23.54% | 14.17% | 40.92% | 51.48% | -20.73% | 35.36% | 21.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBR.L and IUIT.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FCBR.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCBR.L
IUIT.L
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FCBR.L
IUIT.L
Communication Services
FCBR.L
IUIT.L
-
Industrials
FCBR.L
IUIT.L
Basic Materials
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Energy
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
Financial Services
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Healthcare
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Real Estate
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Utilities
FCBR.L
-
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
FCBR.L
IUIT.L
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCBR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.46 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 3.32 | -2.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 8.42 | -6.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCBR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.78 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 1.14 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.24 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBR.L drawdown since its inception was -26.10%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBR.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.10% | -28.01% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.30% | -16.96% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.43% | -28.01% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.10% | -28.01% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -0.78% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -5.29% | -3.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.62% | 6.70% | +3.92% |
Volatility
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) at 7.16%. This indicates that FCBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBR.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 7.16% | +4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.74% | 15.20% | +6.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.76% | 20.23% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 22.82% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.82% | 22.51% | +0.31% |
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FCBR.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCBR.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCBR.L.
FCBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCBR.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for FCBR.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer