PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FCBR.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCBR.L having a 25.54% return and IUIT.L slightly higher at 26.17%.


FCBR.L

1D
-2.54%
1M
29.92%
YTD
25.54%
6M
20.34%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
15.80%
10Y*

IUIT.L

1D
0.00%
1M
16.60%
YTD
26.17%
6M
24.49%
1Y
56.60%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
26.05%
10Y*
27.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FCBR.L
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation
25.54%-0.06%20.93%33.00%-18.86%21.41%27.00%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.54%14.17%40.92%51.48%-20.73%35.36%21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBR.L and IUIT.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020

0.67

The correlation between FCBR.L and IUIT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCBR.L
IUIT.L

Technology

96.4%
99.6%

Communication Services

2.1%

-

Industrials

1.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FCBR.L
96.4%
IUIT.L
99.6%

Communication Services

FCBR.L
2.1%
IUIT.L

-

Industrials

FCBR.L
1.5%
IUIT.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Energy

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L
0.1%

Financial Services

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Healthcare

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Real Estate

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Utilities

FCBR.L

-

IUIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBR.L
FCBR.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FCBR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCBR.LIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

3.32

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

8.42

-6.29

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBR.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBR.L and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCBR.LIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

2.78

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

1.14

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.24

-0.51

Drawdowns

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBR.L drawdown since its inception was -26.10%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBR.L and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBR.LIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.10%

-28.01%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.30%

-16.96%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.43%

-28.01%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.10%

-28.01%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-0.78%

-2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.01%

-5.29%

-3.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.62%

6.70%

+3.92%

Volatility

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulation (FCBR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) at 7.16%. This indicates that FCBR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBR.LIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

7.16%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.74%

15.20%

+6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.76%

20.23%

+4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

22.82%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.82%

22.51%

+0.31%

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBR.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBR.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FCBR.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBR.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCBR.L.

FCBR.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCBR.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBR.L and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer