FCBIX vs. JMABX
FCBIX (Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I) and JMABX (John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FCBIX returned -0.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for JMABX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCBIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for JMABX.
Performance
FCBIX vs. JMABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBIX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than JMABX's 0.61% return.
FCBIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 5.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.65%
JMABX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 6.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.95%
- 10Y*
- —
FCBIX vs. JMABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBIX Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I | 0.44% | 7.80% | 2.45% | 8.40% | -17.14% | -1.64% | 10.75% | 3.99% |
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio | 0.61% | 8.88% | 4.42% | 8.05% | -15.50% | 0.33% | 7.74% | 2.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBIX and JMABX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FCBIX and JMABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBIX vs. JMABX — Risk / Return Rank
FCBIX
JMABX
FCBIX vs. JMABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I (FCBIX) and John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCBIX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.16 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.08 | 7.58 | -2.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCBIX vs. JMABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, which is greater than JMABX's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBIX and JMABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBIX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.28% | -21.48% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.31% | -2.89% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.59% | -5.71% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.25% | -21.48% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -0.86% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.10% | -6.15% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 0.82% | +0.23% |
Volatility
FCBIX vs. JMABX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I (FCBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio (JMABX) at 1.14%. This indicates that FCBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBIX | JMABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 1.14% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.20% | 2.63% | +0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.26% | 3.57% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.70% | 5.53% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.96% | 5.86% | +0.10% |
FCBIX vs. JMABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JMABX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCBIX vs. JMABX - Dividend Comparison
FCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than JMABX's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBIX Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I | 4.19% | 4.06% | 3.59% | 3.39% | 2.50% | 2.78% | 3.34% | 3.24% | 3.60% | 3.12% | 3.50% | 2.96% |
JMABX John Hancock Managed Account Shares Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Portfolio | 5.63% | 5.59% | 5.26% | 3.59% | 3.28% | 3.99% | 2.74% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FCBIX and JMABX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FCBIX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to JMABX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBIX dropped -23.28% vs JMABX's -21.48%.
JMABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCBIX and JMABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer