PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I (FCBIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBIX achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBIX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.96% annualized return.


FCBIX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.84%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
2.65%

FCNTX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.97%
6M
10.79%
1Y
26.78%
3Y*
27.28%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
17.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCBIX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I
0.44%7.80%2.45%8.40%-17.14%-1.64%10.75%14.43%-2.61%6.78%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
10.97%21.76%36.00%38.67%-28.31%24.52%32.48%30.00%-3.81%32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBIX and FCNTX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2010

-0.08

The correlation between FCBIX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBIX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBIX
FCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I (FCBIX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCBIXFCNTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.31

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

9.69

-4.61

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBIX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBIX drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBIX and FCNTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBIXFCNTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-49.19%

+25.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-11.30%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.59%

-19.75%

+13.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.25%

-32.59%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.28%

-32.59%

+9.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-0.48%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-8.15%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.69%

-1.64%

Volatility

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I (FCBIX) is 1.30%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that FCBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBIXFCNTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

5.94%

-4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.20%

11.74%

-8.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.26%

14.92%

-10.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

19.30%

-12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.96%

19.74%

-13.78%

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, which matches FCNTX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCBIX
Fidelity Advisor Corporate Bond Fund Class I
4.19%4.06%3.59%3.39%2.50%2.78%3.34%3.24%3.60%3.12%3.50%2.96%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund
4.21%5.21%4.19%3.78%11.87%10.80%8.01%4.16%7.46%6.08%3.81%5.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBIX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCNTX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to FCBIX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBIX dropped -23.28% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBIX and FCNTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer