FCBD vs. HTAB

Last updated Apr 17, 2026

FCBD (Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF) and HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCBD returned 4.98% vs 6.40% for HTAB. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCBD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HTAB.

Performance

FCBD vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBD achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than HTAB's 1.19% return.

FCBD

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 0.44%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 4.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HTAB

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 6.40%
• 3Y*: 2.87%
• 5Y*: 0.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBD vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	0.44%	6.29%	0.04%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	1.19%	2.86%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBD and HTAB is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	0.62

The correlation between FCBD and HTAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 — a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCBD vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBD

FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 56
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 57

HTAB

HTAB Risk / Return Rank: 34
HTAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
HTAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
HTAB Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HTAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HTAB Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBD vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCBD	HTAB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.53	+0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	2.29	+0.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.30	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	2.41	+0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	7.60	+4.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCBD vs. HTAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBD Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the HTAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBD and HTAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCBD	HTAB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	1.53	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.02	0.44	+1.58

Drawdowns

FCBD vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBD drawdown since its inception was -1.63%, smaller than the maximum HTAB drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBD and HTAB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCBD	HTAB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-14.76%	+13.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.63%	-2.85%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-1.14%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-2.92%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.90%	-0.46%

Volatility

FCBD vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) is 0.98%, while Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that FCBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCBD	HTAB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.98%	1.68%	-0.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	2.56%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36%	4.24%	-1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.58%	5.71%	-3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.58%	5.18%	-2.60%

FCBD vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCBD vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison

FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than HTAB's 3.90% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCBD Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF	4.22%	4.34%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF	3.90%	3.88%	3.57%	3.21%	2.26%	2.18%	1.64%	2.77%	1.61%