PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCBD vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCBD vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCBD achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.


FCBD

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.38%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
2.33%
1M
-5.45%
YTD
83.68%
6M
74.95%
1Y
84.41%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCBD vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
0.26%6.29%0.04%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
83.68%-2.17%3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FCBD and DBE is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCBD vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCBD
FCBD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FCBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCBD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FCBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCBD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCBD vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCBDDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

5.89

-3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

11.53

-3.67

FCBD vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCBD and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCBDDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.43

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.76

0.09

+1.67

Drawdowns

FCBD vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCBD drawdown since its inception was -1.64%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBD and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCBDDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-86.69%

+85.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.64%

-14.41%

+12.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-30.27%

+29.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-57.31%

+56.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

7.35%

-6.81%

Volatility

FCBD vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (FCBD) is 0.86%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that FCBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCBDDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

12.95%

-12.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

30.86%

-29.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

34.97%

-32.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.60%

29.39%

-26.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.60%

28.33%

-25.73%

FCBD vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCBD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCBD vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

FCBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.10%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
FCBD
Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF
4.23%4.34%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCBD and DBE have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to FCBD (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBD dropped -1.64% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 1-year performance, DBE leads with 84.41% vs 4.20% for FCBD. On fees, DBE is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, FCBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DBE has performed better with a 84.41% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBE is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FCBD.

FCBD has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.

FCBD is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FCBD and 0.78% for DBE.

DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCBD and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer