FCAZX vs. MHELX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FCAZX (Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund) and MHELX (MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX returned 11.54%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for MHELX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FCAZX charges 0.16%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MHELX.

Performance

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAZX achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 20.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.53% annualized return.

FCAZX

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 4.92%
• 1Y: 15.79%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 11.54%

MHELX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 19.08%
• 1Y: 40.05%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 5.29%
• 10Y*: 9.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	5.79%	14.61%	16.27%	25.65%	-20.52%	16.05%	18.51%	26.08%	-6.87%	19.10%
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund	20.27%	3.45%	12.51%	16.30%	-20.27%	14.07%	20.57%	22.49%	-12.76%	12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAZX and MHELX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FCAZX and MHELX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FCAZX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAZX

FCAZX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FCAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FCAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FCAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FCAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FCAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

MHELX

MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 70
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCAZX	MHELX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	2.03	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	2.87	-1.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.38	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	4.70	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.43	15.78	-9.35

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAZX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAZX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAZX and MHELX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAZX	MHELX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.73%	-61.24%	+28.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.98%	-8.52%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.80%	-30.81%	+13.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-32.01%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.73%	-39.02%	+6.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.20%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-12.91%	+7.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.53%	+0.08%

Volatility

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) is 5.09%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that FCAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAZX	MHELX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.83%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	15.78%	-4.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	19.73%	-6.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	21.09%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	21.02%	-4.14%

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAZX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCAZX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

FCAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.35%, more than MHELX's 6.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	13.35%	7.51%	7.25%	4.44%	8.39%	3.94%	7.30%	8.49%	6.14%	3.09%	4.63%	5.17%
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund	6.00%	0.00%	2.19%	0.00%	14.45%	5.03%	2.70%	6.13%	0.00%	5.17%	5.51%	6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAZX and MHELX in my portfolio?

FCAZX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCAZX or MHELX?

MHELX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to FCAZX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAZX dropped -32.73% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.