FCAZX vs. FCSRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FCAZX (Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund) and FCSRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX returned 11.54%/yr vs 4.47%/yr for FCSRX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FCAZX charges 0.16%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for FCSRX.

Performance

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAZX achieves a 5.79% return, which is significantly lower than FCSRX's 6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAZX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.47% annualized return.

FCAZX

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 5.79%
• 6M: 4.92%
• 1Y: 15.79%
• 3Y*: 16.14%
• 5Y*: 7.97%
• 10Y*: 11.54%

FCSRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 6.09%
• 6M: 5.84%
• 1Y: 11.64%
• 3Y*: 8.22%
• 5Y*: 4.88%
• 10Y*: 4.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	5.79%	14.61%	16.27%	25.65%	-20.52%	16.05%	18.51%	26.08%	-6.87%	19.10%
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	6.09%	9.27%	4.75%	3.60%	-4.26%	14.68%	2.60%	9.54%	-5.03%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAZX and FCSRX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2013	0.50

The correlation between FCAZX and FCSRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FCAZX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAZX

FCAZX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FCAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
FCAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FCAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FCAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
FCAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

FCSRX

FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 82
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCAZX	FCSRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	2.40	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	3.32	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.46	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	4.14	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.43	16.77	-10.34

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAZX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAZX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, roughly equal to the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAZX and FCSRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAZX	FCSRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.73%	-33.91%	+1.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.98%	-2.76%	-8.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.80%	-5.85%	-11.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-13.22%	-16.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.73%	-20.02%	-12.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-2.76%	+1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-5.09%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	0.68%	+1.93%

Volatility

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.39%. This indicates that FCAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAZX	FCSRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	1.39%	+3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.80%	3.71%	+7.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	4.76%	+8.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	6.89%	+10.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	6.71%	+10.17%

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAZX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCAZX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

FCAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.35%, more than FCSRX's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	13.35%	7.51%	7.25%	4.44%	8.39%	3.94%	7.30%	8.49%	6.14%	3.09%	4.63%	5.17%
FCSRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C	3.34%	3.74%	3.86%	4.35%	6.51%	4.53%	1.32%	2.20%	8.51%	1.58%	1.34%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAZX and FCSRX in my portfolio?

FCAZX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCAZX or FCSRX?

FCAZX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to FCSRX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAZX dropped -32.73% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.