FCAZX vs. BWBIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FCAZX (Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund) and BWBIX (Baron WealthBuilder Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FCAZX returned 8.20%/yr vs 4.11%/yr for BWBIX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCAZX charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BWBIX.

Performance

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAZX achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than BWBIX's -0.41% return.

FCAZX

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 5.96%
• 6M: 6.40%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 16.79%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

BWBIX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: -0.41%
• 6M: 4.74%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: 4.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	5.96%	14.61%	16.27%	25.65%	-20.52%	16.05%	18.51%	26.08%	-10.81%
BWBIX Baron WealthBuilder Fund	-0.41%	10.23%	19.62%	25.77%	-32.58%	14.76%	62.85%	36.41%	-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAZX and BWBIX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018	0.89

The correlation between FCAZX and BWBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCAZX vs. BWBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAZX

FCAZX Risk / Return Rank: 23
FCAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FCAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FCAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FCAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FCAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BWBIX

BWBIX Risk / Return Rank: 10
BWBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BWBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BWBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BWBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BWBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) and Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCAZX	BWBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	0.72	+0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.18	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.14	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	0.89	+0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	2.94	+3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the BWBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAZX and BWBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCAZX	BWBIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	0.72	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.20	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.52	+0.12

Drawdowns

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAZX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum BWBIX drawdown of -39.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAZX and BWBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAZX	BWBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.73%	-39.14%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.98%	-11.65%	+0.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.80%	-21.59%	+3.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-39.14%	+9.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-2.39%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.13%	-11.72%	+6.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	3.53%	-0.95%

Volatility

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund (FCAZX) is 3.28%, while Baron WealthBuilder Fund (BWBIX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that FCAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAZX	BWBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.28%	3.59%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	11.02%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.51%	14.41%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	21.08%	-4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	23.14%	-6.30%

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAZX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than BWBIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FCAZX vs. BWBIX - Dividend Comparison

FCAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, less than BWBIX's 7.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BWBIX Baron WealthBuilder Fund	7.64%	7.61%	0.77%	0.06%	3.21%	3.75%	1.24%	3.51%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCAZX Franklin Corefolio Allocation Fund	7.09%	7.51%	7.25%	4.44%	8.39%	3.94%	7.30%	8.49%	6.14%	3.09%	4.63%	5.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAZX and BWBIX in my portfolio?

FCAZX and BWBIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCAZX or BWBIX?

BWBIX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FCAZX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAZX dropped -32.73% vs BWBIX's -39.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.