PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAUX vs. NALFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAUX achieves a 15.66% return, which is significantly lower than NALFX's 16.54% return.


FCAUX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-2.27%
6M
15.66%
YTD
15.66%
1Y
34.77%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*

NALFX

1D
-1.34%
1M
-2.22%
6M
16.54%
YTD
16.54%
1Y
23.38%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
15.66%21.27%24.06%19.06%-25.29%11.40%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
16.54%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAUX and NALFX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.69

The correlation between FCAUX and NALFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAUX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAUX
FCAUX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FCAUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAUX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCAUXNALFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.27

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.37

9.47

+4.90

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the NALFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAUX and NALFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAUX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, smaller than the maximum NALFX drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAUX and NALFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAUXNALFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.11%

-59.67%

+24.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-7.53%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.34%

-24.35%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.11%

-38.03%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-2.27%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-14.81%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.60%

-0.11%

Volatility

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) at 5.36%. This indicates that FCAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NALFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAUXNALFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

5.36%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

12.76%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.36%

15.31%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

17.91%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

17.97%

+1.30%

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAUX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAUX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison

FCAUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAUX
Fidelity Climate Action Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.15%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
1.00%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAUX and NALFX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCAUX has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to NALFX (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAUX dropped -35.11% vs NALFX's -59.67%.

FCAUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAUX and NALFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer