FCAUX vs. MFWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX).
FCAUX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021. MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
FCAUX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCAUX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAUX Fidelity Climate Action Fund | -2.42% | 21.27% | 24.06% | 19.06% | -25.29% | 11.40% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 0.94% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 1.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCAUX achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly lower than MFWIX's 0.94% return.
FCAUX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- -2.42%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 27.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFWIX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 3.21%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 6.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCAUX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCAUX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCAUX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank
FCAUX
MFWIX
FCAUX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCAUX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 1.99 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.89 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | 7.31 | +2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCAUX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.71 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCAUX and MFWIX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCAUX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison
FCAUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.68%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCAUX Fidelity Climate Action Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.68% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
FCAUX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCAUX drawdown since its inception was -35.11%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAUX and MFWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCAUX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.11% | -33.01% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -6.85% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.34% | -5.18% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -3.83% | -7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.77% | +1.10% |
Volatility
FCAUX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAUX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 3.44%. This indicates that FCAUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCAUX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 3.44% | +3.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 5.43% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.74% | 8.94% | +11.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 9.11% | +10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 9.61% | +9.69% |