FCA vs. DRAG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FCA (First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund) and DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) are both China Equities funds. FCA is passively managed, while DRAG is actively managed. FCA charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for DRAG.

Performance

FCA vs. DRAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FCA

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -4.08%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 44.90%
• 3Y*: 20.06%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCA vs. DRAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	-2.92%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%

FCA vs. DRAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCA	DRAG
Industrials	25.2%	-
Financial Services	19.7%	-
Basic Materials	19.1%	-
Energy	14.8%	-
Technology	10.3%	10.2%
Healthcare	3.0%	-
Communication Services	2.9%	17.3%
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	72.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

FCA vs. DRAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCA

FCA Risk / Return Rank: 62
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCA vs. DRAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FCA	DRAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FCA	DRAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	—	—

Drawdowns

FCA vs. DRAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than DRAG's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and DRAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCA	DRAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.56%	0.00%	-45.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.87%	0.00%	-8.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.62%	0.00%	-21.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.87%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FCA	DRAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.31%	0.00%	+22.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.59%	0.00%	+27.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.63%	0.00%	+26.63%

FCA vs. DRAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCA vs. DRAG - Dividend Comparison

FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FCA First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund	2.31%	2.67%	5.17%	5.70%	6.00%	4.91%	4.12%	3.73%	3.10%	2.30%	2.51%	4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FCA or DRAG?

On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCA or DRAG?

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCA or DRAG?

FCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.

What is the main difference between FCA and DRAG?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FCA and 0.59% for DRAG.