FBYY vs. TSLR
FBYY (GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
FBYY vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBYY achieves a -30.28% return, which is significantly higher than TSLR's -60.77% return.
FBYY
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- 6M
- -28.55%
- YTD
- -30.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -40.45%
- 6M
- -56.28%
- YTD
- -60.77%
- 1Y
- -24.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.18K | $10.40K | $13.97K | |
| $20.25M | $21.25M | $40.88M |
FBYY vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | -30.28% | -11.29% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -60.77% | -4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBYY and TSLR is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBYY vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
FBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLR
FBYY vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF (FBYY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.38 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBYY vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBYY drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBYY and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.00% | -82.80% | +41.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.99% | -79.93% | +38.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.60% | -51.13% | +25.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 31.27% | — |
Volatility
FBYY vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBYY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 43.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 70.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.23% | 92.93% | -69.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 116.23% | -93.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 116.23% | -93.00% |
FBYY vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBYY vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
FBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.90%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FBYY GraniteShares YieldBoost META ETF | 54.90% | 10.35% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBYY and TSLR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FBYY.
FBYY has the higher dividend yield at 54.90%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
FBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FBYY and 0.95% for TSLR.
Find the right allocation for FBYY and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer