PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBY vs. QYLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBY vs. QYLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBY vs. QYLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


FBY

1D
4.34%
1M
-10.82%
YTD
-12.51%
6M
-21.11%
1Y
-6.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBY vs. QYLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE's 0.61% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBY vs. QYLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY
FBY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. QYLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF (QYLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBYQYLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.55

FBY vs. QYLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBYQYLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

Dividends

FBY vs. QYLE - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.87%, while QYLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
58.87%55.43%53.89%8.31%
QYLE
Global X NASDAQ 100 ESG Covered Call ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBY vs. QYLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than QYLE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and QYLE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBYQYLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

0.00%

-31.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.81%

0.00%

-24.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

0.00%

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.21%

Volatility

FBY vs. QYLE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBYQYLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.41%

0.00%

+32.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.40%

0.00%

+28.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

0.00%

+28.40%