FBUF vs. NVDO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FBUF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

FBUF vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBUF achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.

FBUF

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 5.93%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 1Y: 19.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.25%

NVDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 13.52%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	$202.49K	$184.01K	$259.55K
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$24.01K

FBUF vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	7.94%	7.23%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	16.35%	10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FBUF and NVDO is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

FBUF vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 88
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBUF vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBUF	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.19	—	—

Drawdowns

FBUF vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBUF drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBUF and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBUF	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.09%	-16.25%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.73%	+4.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-4.94%	+3.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBUF	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.46%	30.22%	-21.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.66%	30.22%	-20.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.66%	30.22%	-20.56%

FBUF vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBUF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBUF vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than NVDO's 14.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.57%	0.64%	0.54%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.32%	16.66%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBUF and NVDO in my portfolio?

FBUF and NVDO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBUF or NVDO?

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBUF or NVDO?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for NVDO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBUF or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.57% for FBUF.

What is the main difference between FBUF and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FBUF and 0.77% for NVDO.