PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBUF vs. BOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBUF vs. BOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBUF vs. BOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
-1.98%14.01%10.13%
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
-2.29%14.34%7.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBUF achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly higher than BOCT's -2.29% return.


FBUF

1D
0.17%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
1.07%
1Y
17.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BOCT

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.89%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
18.02%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBUF vs. BOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBUF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBUF vs. BOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBUF vs. BOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBUFBOCTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

1.08

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

1.63

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.62

+0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.97

8.18

+0.79

FBUF vs. BOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBUF Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the BOCT Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBUF and BOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBUFBOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.08

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.13

0.68

+0.45

Correlation

The correlation between FBUF and BOCT is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FBUF vs. BOCT - Dividend Comparison

FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while BOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
0.67%0.64%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%

Drawdowns

FBUF vs. BOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBUF drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum BOCT drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBUF and BOCT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBUFBOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-24.54%

+13.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

-6.09%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.80%

-3.64%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.43%

-2.65%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.78%

-0.17%

Volatility

FBUF vs. BOCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) is 3.03%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that FBUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBUFBOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

3.74%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

6.60%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

13.16%

-2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.85%

11.05%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.85%

13.93%

-4.08%