FBUF vs. BOCT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) and BOCT (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October) are both Defined Outcome funds. FBUF is actively managed, while BOCT is passively managed. Over the past year, FBUF returned 16.49% vs 18.25% for BOCT. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBUF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for BOCT.

Performance

FBUF vs. BOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBUF achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than BOCT's 6.25% return.

FBUF

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: 3.62%
• 6M: 3.09%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BOCT

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 6.25%
• 6M: 5.87%
• 1Y: 18.25%
• 3Y*: 13.66%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBUF vs. BOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	3.62%	14.01%	10.55%
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October	6.25%	14.34%	7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FBUF and BOCT is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024	0.89

The correlation between FBUF and BOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBUF vs. BOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 68
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BOCT

BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 74
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBUF vs. BOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBUF	BOCT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.19	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.06	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	3.01	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	14.26	-1.67

FBUF vs. BOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBUF Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the BOCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBUF and BOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBUF vs. BOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBUF drawdown since its inception was -11.09%, smaller than the maximum BOCT drawdown of -24.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBUF and BOCT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBUF	BOCT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.09%	-24.54%	+13.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.61%	-6.09%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-14.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.83%	-1.08%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-2.59%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	1.28%	+0.03%

Volatility

FBUF vs. BOCT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) at 2.64%. This indicates that FBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBUF	BOCT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	2.64%	+0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.11%	6.48%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.11%	8.40%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.69%	11.15%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.69%	13.80%	-4.11%

FBUF vs. BOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBUF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBUF vs. BOCT - Dividend Comparison

FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while BOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BOCT Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.60%	0.64%	0.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBUF and BOCT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FBUF and BOCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBUF or BOCT?

FBUF has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to BOCT (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBUF dropped -11.09% vs BOCT's -24.54%.

Which ETF is better, FBUF or BOCT?

On 1-year performance, BOCT leads with 18.25% vs 16.49% for FBUF. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBUF or BOCT?

Over the 1-year period, BOCT has performed better with a 18.25% return vs 16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBUF or BOCT?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BOCT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBUF or BOCT?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for BOCT.

What is the main difference between FBUF and BOCT?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FBUF and 0.79% for BOCT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.