FBTU.L vs. CNCR
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR).
FBTU.L and CNCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBTU.L is managed by First Trust. CNCR is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2015.
Performance
FBTU.L vs. CNCR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBTU.L vs. CNCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | -3.84% |
CNCR Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
FBTU.L
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 21.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- —
CNCR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBTU.L vs. CNCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTU.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CNCR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBTU.L vs. CNCR — Risk / Return Rank
FBTU.L
CNCR
FBTU.L vs. CNCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and Loncar Cancer Immunotherapy ETF (CNCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTU.L | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTU.L | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | — | — |
Dividends
FBTU.L vs. CNCR - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBTU.L nor CNCR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FBTU.L vs. CNCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, which is greater than CNCR's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTU.L and CNCR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTU.L | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | 0.00% | -33.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.15% | 0.00% | -9.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | 0.00% | -13.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.82% | — | — |
Volatility
FBTU.L vs. CNCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBTU.L | CNCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.07% | 0.00% | +23.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 0.00% | +20.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 0.00% | +21.28% |