FBTTX vs. FACDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX).
FBTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. FACDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FBTTX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBTTX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 2.18% | 39.21% | 5.08% | 10.43% | -8.22% | -3.35% | 31.82% | 25.39% | -4.19% | 25.37% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | -6.09% | 14.19% | 3.97% | 3.81% | -13.07% | 11.25% | 21.07% | 27.89% | 7.20% | 24.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTTX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than FACDX's -6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FBTTX has outperformed FACDX with an annualized return of 11.54%, while FACDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.73% annualized return.
FBTTX
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 15.39%
- 1Y
- 55.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
FACDX
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBTTX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTTX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBTTX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank
FBTTX
FACDX
FBTTX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTTX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 0.45 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 0.76 | +1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.09 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.13 | 0.59 | +2.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 1.82 | +10.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTTX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 0.45 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.11 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.57 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTTX and FACDX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBTTX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison
FBTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than FACDX's 14.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTTX Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M | 1.50% | 1.53% | 6.41% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 21.60% | 8.79% | 7.10% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.42% |
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | 14.15% | 13.28% | 12.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.24% | 5.94% | 0.32% | 5.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.66% |
Drawdowns
FBTTX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTTX drawdown since its inception was -63.75%, which is greater than FACDX's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTTX and FACDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTTX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.75% | -44.55% | -19.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.58% | -13.43% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.64% | -29.35% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -29.35% | -9.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.61% | -10.01% | +7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.95% | -9.36% | -12.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 4.31% | -0.59% |
Volatility
FBTTX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class M (FBTTX) has a higher volatility of 9.37% compared to Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) at 7.07%. This indicates that FBTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FACDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBTTX | FACDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.37% | 7.07% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 11.62% | +5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.99% | 18.76% | +7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 17.76% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 18.79% | +5.79% |