PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTIX vs. JNGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class (FBTIX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTIX achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than JNGLX's -3.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FBTIX having a 10.80% annualized return and JNGLX not far behind at 10.28%.


FBTIX

1D
-3.05%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
-0.73%
6M
-4.04%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
17.29%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
10.80%

JNGLX

1D
-2.62%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
-3.59%
6M
-1.99%
1Y
25.11%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBTIX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class
-0.73%39.91%5.63%11.02%-7.74%-2.86%32.53%26.11%-3.61%26.15%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
-3.59%24.84%3.60%7.51%-2.69%6.78%25.66%29.20%4.17%22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTIX and JNGLX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2000

0.88

The correlation between FBTIX and JNGLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTIX vs. JNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTIX
FBTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FBTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JNGLX
JNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class (FBTIX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTIXJNGLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.11

1.73

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

2.53

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

2.65

+2.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.39

8.47

+6.92

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the JNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTIX and JNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTIXJNGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.73

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.45

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.59

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.57

-0.25

Drawdowns

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTIX drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than JNGLX's maximum drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTIX and JNGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTIXJNGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.45%

-59.00%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.68%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.80%

-21.17%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.41%

-22.21%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.64%

-27.37%

-11.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.90%

-6.49%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.61%

-17.65%

-2.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.02%

-0.01%

Volatility

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class (FBTIX) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) at 4.69%. This indicates that FBTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTIXJNGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.09%

4.69%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

10.95%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

14.85%

+7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

15.85%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

17.38%

+7.03%

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGLX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTIX vs. JNGLX - Dividend Comparison

FBTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than JNGLX's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTIX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund I Class
1.40%1.39%5.69%1.36%0.00%18.74%8.01%6.44%2.35%0.00%0.00%5.23%
JNGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund
4.73%4.56%5.84%4.26%0.25%9.85%7.80%6.23%13.32%0.89%0.30%8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBTIX and JNGLX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTIX has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to JNGLX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTIX dropped -63.45% vs JNGLX's -59.00%.

FBTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTIX and JNGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer