FBTC vs. MSTU

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while MSTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. FBTC is passively managed, while MSTU is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -43.65% vs -97.30% for MSTU. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.

Performance

FBTC vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -27.08% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -78.22% return.

FBTC

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 3.87%
• 6M: -18.12%
• YTD: -27.08%
• 1Y: -43.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.58%

MSTU

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: -15.81%
• 6M: -72.32%
• YTD: -78.22%
• 1Y: -97.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -75.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	$185.12M	$202.75M	$237.85M
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	$200.96M	$178.85M	$198.52M

FBTC vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-27.08%	-6.56%	55.63%
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	-78.22%	-89.07%	205.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and MSTU is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	0.78

The correlation between FBTC and MSTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBTC vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MSTU

MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBTC vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBTC	MSTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	-0.66	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	-2.36	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.76	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.82	-0.99	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	-1.20	-0.06

FBTC vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and MSTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -53.35%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -99.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and MSTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC	MSTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.35%	-99.43%	+46.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.35%	-98.15%	+44.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.21%	-99.29%	+50.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.22%	-74.16%	+55.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.76%	80.83%	-46.07%

Volatility

FBTC vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) is 8.89%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 32.84%. This indicates that FBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC	MSTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	32.84%	-23.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.75%	119.27%	-85.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.38%	147.80%	-103.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.44%	168.37%	-118.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.44%	168.37%	-118.93%

FBTC vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBTC vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBTC and MSTU in my portfolio?

FBTC and MSTU have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBTC or MSTU?

MSTU has higher volatility (32.84%) compared to FBTC (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -53.35% vs MSTU's -99.43%.

Which ETF is better, FBTC or MSTU?

On 1-year performance, FBTC leads with -43.65% vs -97.30% for MSTU. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBTC has been the lower-risk option at 8.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBTC or MSTU?

Over the 1-year period, FBTC has performed better with a -43.65% return vs -97.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBTC or MSTU?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBTC or MSTU?

FBTC and MSTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FBTC and MSTU?

FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 1.05% for MSTU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.