FBTC vs. MSTU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while MSTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. FBTC is passively managed, while MSTU is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -38.65% vs -95.37% for MSTU. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTU.

Performance

FBTC vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -54.27% return.

FBTC

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: -18.37%
• YTD: -25.34%
• 6M: -29.78%
• 1Y: -38.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTU

• 1D: -14.03%
• 1M: -55.66%
• YTD: -54.27%
• 6M: -71.83%
• 1Y: -95.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-25.34%	-6.56%	55.45%
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	-54.27%	-89.07%	197.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and MSTU is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024	0.78

The correlation between FBTC and MSTU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBTC vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

MSTU

MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 1
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBTC	MSTU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	-0.69	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.23	-2.12	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.78	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	-0.99	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	-1.27	-0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBTC vs. MSTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the MSTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and MSTU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBTC	MSTU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	-0.69	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	-0.40	+0.70

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and MSTU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC	MSTU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.33%	-98.58%	+49.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.33%	-96.58%	+47.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.00%	-98.52%	+50.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.01%	-71.94%	+55.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.41%	75.17%	-46.76%

Volatility

FBTC vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) is 9.39%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 39.06%. This indicates that FBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBTC	MSTU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.39%	39.06%	-29.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.38%	111.87%	-77.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.61%	138.62%	-95.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.13%	169.06%	-118.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.13%	169.06%	-118.93%

FBTC vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBTC vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBTC and MSTU in my portfolio?

FBTC and MSTU have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBTC or MSTU?

MSTU has higher volatility (39.06%) compared to FBTC (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -49.33% vs MSTU's -98.58%.

Which ETF is better, FBTC or MSTU?

On 1-year performance, FBTC leads with -38.65% vs -95.37% for MSTU. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBTC or MSTU?

Over the 1-year period, FBTC has performed better with a -38.65% return vs -95.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBTC or MSTU?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBTC or MSTU?

FBTC and MSTU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FBTC and MSTU?

FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MSTU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 1.05% for MSTU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.