PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC vs. FELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTC vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly lower than FELC's 11.23% return.


FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FELC

1D
-0.59%
1M
5.59%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.57%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-6.56%99.56%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
11.23%17.09%24.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and FELC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTC vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTCFELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.44

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

3.16

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

14.66

-16.03

FBTC vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTCFELCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

2.41

-3.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

1.59

-1.30

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than FELC's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and FELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTCFELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-18.59%

-30.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.33%

-9.09%

-40.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.00%

-0.59%

-47.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-1.91%

-14.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.41%

1.95%

+26.46%

Volatility

FBTC vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) at 2.78%. This indicates that FBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTCFELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

2.78%

+6.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.38%

8.93%

+25.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

11.90%

+31.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.13%

15.17%

+34.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.13%

15.17%

+34.96%

FBTC vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FBTC vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.85%0.92%1.03%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBTC and FELC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FELC (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -49.33% vs FELC's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 28.58% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 28.58% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.

FELC has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FELC is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.18% for FELC.

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTC and FELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer