FBTC vs. FELC
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and FELC (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while FELC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. FBTC is passively managed, while FELC is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -39.80% vs 24.68% for FELC. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELC.
Performance
FBTC vs. FELC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -28.83% return, which is significantly lower than FELC's 8.65% return.
FBTC
- 1D
- -3.16%
- 1M
- -17.78%
- YTD
- -28.83%
- 6M
- -28.94%
- 1Y
- -39.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FELC
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- 24.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -28.83% | -6.56% | 94.28% |
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 8.65% | 17.09% | 24.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and FELC is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
FELC
FBTC vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBTC | FELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.36 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 2.73 | -3.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.30 | 12.19 | -13.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -52.07%, which is greater than FELC's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and FELC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | FELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.07% | -18.59% | -33.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.07% | -9.09% | -42.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.43% | -2.90% | -47.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.77% | -1.91% | -14.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.54% | 2.03% | +28.51% |
Volatility
FBTC vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a higher volatility of 13.04% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) at 4.96%. This indicates that FBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | FELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.04% | 4.96% | +8.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.56% | 9.91% | +24.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.18% | 12.62% | +31.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.08% | 15.29% | +34.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.08% | 15.29% | +34.79% |
FBTC vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FBTC vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison
FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 0.86% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC and FELC have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBTC has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to FELC (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -52.07% vs FELC's -18.59%.
On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 24.68% vs -39.80% for FBTC. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 24.68% return vs -39.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FBTC.
FELC has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FELC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.18% for FELC.
FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and FELC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer