FBTC vs. FBND
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. FBTC is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past year, FBTC returned -38.65% vs 5.59% for FBND. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
FBTC vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's 0.50% return.
FBTC
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -25.34%
- 6M
- -29.78%
- 1Y
- -38.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
FBTC vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -25.34% | -6.56% | 99.56% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.57% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and FBND is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
FBND
FBTC vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTC | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.25 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 2.11 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 6.37 | -7.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTC | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | 1.46 | -2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.44 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -17.25% | -32.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.33% | -2.66% | -46.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.00% | -1.43% | -46.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -3.35% | -12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.41% | 0.88% | +27.53% |
Volatility
FBTC vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.27%. This indicates that FBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | 1.27% | +8.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.38% | 2.73% | +31.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 3.86% | +39.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.13% | 5.92% | +44.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.13% | 6.10% | +44.03% |
FBTC vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBTC vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC and FBND have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBTC has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to FBND (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -49.33% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 1-year performance, FBND leads with 5.59% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FBND has performed better with a 5.59% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.36% for FBND.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer