FBTC vs. CBXO
FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. FBTC is passively managed, while CBXO is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
FBTC vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly lower than CBXO's -3.67% return.
FBTC
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -25.34%
- 6M
- -29.78%
- 1Y
- -38.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBTC vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -25.34% | -28.17% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.67% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTC and CBXO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBTC vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
FBTC
CBXO
FBTC vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -2.36 | +2.65 |
Drawdowns
FBTC vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -11.40% | -37.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.00% | -11.40% | -36.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -8.46% | -7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.41% | — | — |
Volatility
FBTC vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBTC | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.61% | 7.23% | +36.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.13% | 7.23% | +42.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.13% | 7.23% | +42.90% |
FBTC vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBTC vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBTC and CBXO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBXO.
CBXO has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.
FBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for FBTC and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer