PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC vs. BTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTC vs. BTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly higher than BTF's -33.48% return.


FBTC

1D
-2.65%
1M
-18.37%
YTD
-25.34%
6M
-29.78%
1Y
-38.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTF

1D
-4.19%
1M
-21.21%
YTD
-33.48%
6M
-37.41%
1Y
-36.83%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. BTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
-25.34%-6.56%99.56%
BTF
Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF
-33.48%-12.44%50.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and BTF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.93

The correlation between FBTC and BTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTC vs. BTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BTF
BTF Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTF Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. BTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTCBTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.91

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.65

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

-1.11

-0.26

FBTC vs. BTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the BTF Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC and BTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTCBTFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

-0.68

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.16

+0.46

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. BTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum BTF drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and BTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTCBTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-77.50%

+28.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.33%

-56.49%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.00%

-56.49%

+8.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-39.65%

+23.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.41%

33.32%

-4.91%

Volatility

FBTC vs. BTF - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF (BTF) have volatilities of 9.39% and 9.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTCBTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

9.55%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.38%

39.47%

-5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.61%

54.33%

-10.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.13%

58.43%

-8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.13%

58.43%

-8.30%

FBTC vs. BTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTF's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTC vs. BTF - Dividend Comparison

FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 219.12%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BTF
Valkyrie Bitcoin and Ether Strategy ETF
219.12%146.05%52.96%15.98%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FBTC and BTF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BTF has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to FBTC (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTC dropped -49.33% vs BTF's -77.50%.

On 1-year performance, BTF leads with -36.83% vs -38.65% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBTC has been the lower-risk option at 9.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BTF has performed better with a -36.83% return vs -38.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.24% for BTF.

BTF has the higher dividend yield at 219.12%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Valkyrie. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 1.24% for BTF.

BTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTC and BTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer