FBTC vs. BLOX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) and BLOX (Nicholas Crypto Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. FBTC is passively managed, while BLOX is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBTC charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BLOX.

Performance

FBTC vs. BLOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTC achieves a -25.34% return, which is significantly lower than BLOX's 16.52% return.

FBTC

• 1D: -2.65%
• 1M: -18.37%
• YTD: -25.34%
• 6M: -29.78%
• 1Y: -38.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLOX

• 1D: -2.56%
• 1M: 10.59%
• YTD: 16.52%
• 6M: 5.53%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC vs. BLOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-25.34%	-16.62%
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	16.52%	9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC and BLOX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

FBTC vs. BLOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC vs. BLOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) and Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBTC	BLOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.23	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBTC	BLOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.54	-0.24

Drawdowns

FBTC vs. BLOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum BLOX drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC and BLOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBTC	BLOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.33%	-47.09%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.00%	-19.45%	-28.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.01%	-18.53%	+2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBTC	BLOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.39%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.38%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.61%	53.44%	-9.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.13%	53.44%	-3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.13%	53.44%	-3.31%

FBTC vs. BLOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBTC vs. BLOX - Dividend Comparison

FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.81%.

Position	TTM	2025
BLOX Nicholas Crypto Income ETF	36.81%	22.69%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBTC and BLOX in my portfolio?

FBTC and BLOX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBTC or BLOX?

On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBTC or BLOX?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBTC or BLOX?

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 36.81%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FBTC and BLOX?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FBTC and 1.03% for BLOX.