PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FBTC.TO is traded in CAD, while EBIT-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EBIT-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FBTC.TO having a -25.28% return and EBIT-U.TO slightly lower at -26.24%.


FBTC.TO

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-32.43%
YTD
-25.28%
1Y
-45.25%
3Y*
31.17%
5Y*
10Y*

EBIT-U.TO

1D
-1.77%
1M
-1.72%
6M
-32.25%
YTD
-26.24%
1Y
-45.63%
3Y*
29.47%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FBTC.TO
Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF
-25.28%-10.85%137.16%145.80%-61.34%-20.46%
EBIT-U.TO
Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD
-26.24%-11.00%134.26%147.82%-62.74%-19.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTC.TO and EBIT-U.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2021

0.90

The correlation between FBTC.TO and EBIT-U.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTC.TO
FBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EBIT-U.TO
EBIT-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EBIT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBIT-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) and Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBTC.TOEBIT-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

-0.85

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.33

-1.35

+0.01

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is comparable to the EBIT-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTC.TO and EBIT-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -70.77%, smaller than the maximum EBIT-U.TO drawdown of -76.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTC.TO and EBIT-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTC.TOEBIT-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.77%

-76.08%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.71%

-53.57%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.71%

-53.57%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.98%

-49.16%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.41%

-33.36%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.99%

33.94%

+0.05%

Volatility

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC.TO) is 10.11%, while Evolve Bitcoin ETF USD (EBIT-U.TO) has a volatility of 12.97%. This indicates that FBTC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBIT-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTC.TOEBIT-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.11%

12.97%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.46%

37.63%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.60%

46.44%

-2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.06%

54.82%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.06%

56.34%

-4.28%

Dividends

FBTC.TO vs. EBIT-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBTC.TO nor EBIT-U.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FBTC.TO and EBIT-U.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Evolve.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTC.TO and EBIT-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer