PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTAX vs. FHCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTAX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly higher than FHCCX's -5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FBTAX has outperformed FHCCX with an annualized return of 10.51%, while FHCCX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.39% annualized return.


FBTAX

1D
-3.05%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
-4.16%
1Y
44.32%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
10.51%

FHCCX

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
-5.48%
6M
-22.16%
1Y
-5.48%
3Y*
-2.55%
5Y*
-2.61%
10Y*
5.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBTAX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A
-0.83%39.54%5.37%10.70%-7.95%-3.10%32.17%25.74%-3.86%25.80%
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
-5.48%-5.49%3.20%3.02%-13.72%10.43%20.15%26.96%6.37%23.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTAX and FHCCX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2000

0.83

The correlation between FBTAX and FHCCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBTAX
FHCCX

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FBTAX
100.0%
FHCCX
100.0%

Basic Materials

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Communication Services

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Consumer Defensive

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Energy

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Financial Services

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Industrials

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Real Estate

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Technology

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Utilities

FBTAX

-

FHCCX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTAX vs. FHCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTAX
FBTAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FHCCX
FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTAXFHCCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

-0.22

+2.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.87

-0.12

+2.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.98

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

-0.19

+5.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.20

-0.36

+15.57

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FHCCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTAX and FHCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTAXFHCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

-0.22

+2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

-0.13

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.28

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.46

-0.15

Drawdowns

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTAX drawdown since its inception was -63.55%, which is greater than FHCCX's maximum drawdown of -45.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTAX and FHCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTAXFHCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.55%

-45.28%

-18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-27.25%

+18.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.86%

-27.25%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-29.67%

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.82%

-29.67%

-9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.91%

-23.77%

+14.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-10.19%

-11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

14.26%

-11.23%

Volatility

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) at 5.07%. This indicates that FBTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTAXFHCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

5.07%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

22.60%

-5.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.10%

23.64%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.47%

19.54%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.42%

19.57%

+4.85%

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FHCCX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTAX vs. FHCCX - Dividend Comparison

FBTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBTAX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A
1.47%1.45%6.00%1.15%0.00%20.12%8.37%6.77%2.50%0.00%0.00%5.36%
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%17.59%0.00%0.00%8.32%6.85%0.41%6.43%0.00%0.00%7.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBTAX and FHCCX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTAX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to FHCCX (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTAX dropped -63.55% vs FHCCX's -45.28%.

FBTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTAX and FHCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer