PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBTAX vs. FACDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBTAX achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than FACDX's -3.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FBTAX has outperformed FACDX with an annualized return of 10.86%, while FACDX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.


FBTAX

1D
-2.49%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
2.30%
6M
1.23%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
10.86%

FACDX

1D
-1.65%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-3.44%
6M
-3.72%
1Y
16.69%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
2.12%
10Y*
8.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBTAX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A
2.30%39.54%5.37%10.70%-7.95%-3.10%32.17%25.74%-3.86%25.80%
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
-3.44%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FBTAX and FACDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2000

0.83

The correlation between FBTAX and FACDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBTAX
FACDX

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FBTAX
100.0%
FACDX
100.0%

Basic Materials

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Communication Services

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Consumer Defensive

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Energy

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Financial Services

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Industrials

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Real Estate

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Technology

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Utilities

FBTAX

-

FACDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBTAX vs. FACDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBTAX
FBTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTAXFACDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

1.11

+1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.34

1.71

+1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.19

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.45

1.35

+5.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.71

3.69

+14.03

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the FACDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBTAX and FACDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTAXFACDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

1.11

+1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.12

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.45

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.57

-0.26

Drawdowns

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBTAX drawdown since its inception was -63.55%, which is greater than FACDX's maximum drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTAX and FACDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTAXFACDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.55%

-44.55%

-19.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-13.43%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.86%

-17.49%

-15.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-29.35%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.82%

-29.35%

-9.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-7.47%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.22%

-9.35%

-11.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

4.90%

-1.93%

Volatility

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A (FBTAX) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) at 4.75%. This indicates that FBTAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FACDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTAXFACDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.58%

4.75%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.43%

11.98%

+4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

15.77%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.43%

17.88%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

18.77%

+5.64%

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBTAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FACDX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBTAX vs. FACDX - Dividend Comparison

FBTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than FACDX's 13.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
13.76%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%
FBTAX
Fidelity Advisor Biotechnology Fund Class A
1.42%1.45%6.00%1.15%0.00%20.12%8.37%6.77%2.50%0.00%0.00%5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBTAX and FACDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBTAX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FACDX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBTAX dropped -63.55% vs FACDX's -44.55%.

FBTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBTAX and FACDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer