FBT vs. TRUH
FBT (First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. FBT is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FBT charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
FBT vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FBT
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- YTD
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 49.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.46%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $41.36M | $24.77M | $18.75M | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
FBT vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FBT First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index | 21.02% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBT and TRUH is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBT vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
FBT
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBT vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index (FBT) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBT | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBT vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBT drawdown since its inception was -40.51%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBT and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBT | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.51% | -4.51% | -36.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -2.75% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.09% | -1.64% | -9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | — | — |
Volatility
FBT vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBT | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 17.62% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.01% | 17.62% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 17.62% | +6.15% |
FBT vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBT has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBT vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
FBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBT First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBT and TRUH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBT.
TRUH has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.00% for FBT.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBT and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for FBT and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer