PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBT vs. BBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBT vs. BBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index (FBT) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBT achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than BBC's 8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FBT has outperformed BBC with an annualized return of 8.86%, while BBC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.64% annualized return.


FBT

1D
2.92%
1M
6.19%
YTD
7.08%
6M
3.95%
1Y
35.94%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
8.86%

BBC

1D
0.43%
1M
-6.52%
YTD
8.64%
6M
14.08%
1Y
116.78%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
-1.96%
10Y*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBT vs. BBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBT
First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index
7.08%24.25%5.88%2.55%-4.83%-2.26%12.96%19.74%-0.30%37.07%
BBC
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF
8.64%63.77%-1.11%-1.80%-35.13%-22.31%30.32%63.81%-18.29%57.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FBT and BBC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2014

0.80

The correlation between FBT and BBC shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FBT vs. BBC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBT
BBC

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FBT
100.0%
BBC
100.0%

Basic Materials

FBT

-

BBC

-

Communication Services

FBT

-

BBC

-

Consumer Cyclical

FBT

-

BBC

-

Consumer Defensive

FBT

-

BBC

-

Energy

FBT

-

BBC

-

Financial Services

FBT

-

BBC

-

Industrials

FBT

-

BBC

-

Real Estate

FBT

-

BBC

-

Technology

FBT

-

BBC

-

Utilities

FBT

-

BBC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBT vs. BBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBT
FBT Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
FBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBT Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBT Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BBC
BBC Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBT vs. BBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index (FBT) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBTBBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

7.78

-5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.43

24.80

-17.37

FBT vs. BBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBT Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the BBC Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBT and BBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBTBBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

3.32

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

-0.05

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.20

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.12

+0.39

Drawdowns

FBT vs. BBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBT drawdown since its inception was -40.51%, smaller than the maximum BBC drawdown of -76.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBT and BBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBTBBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.51%

-76.85%

+36.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.26%

-15.10%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.05%

-54.45%

+34.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.05%

-72.44%

+43.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.37%

-76.85%

+44.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-30.27%

+29.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.17%

-37.14%

+25.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

4.73%

+0.12%

Volatility

FBT vs. BBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index (FBT) is 6.94%, while Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF (BBC) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that FBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBTBBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

10.93%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.87%

26.43%

-10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

35.50%

-14.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.89%

39.31%

-17.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.91%

37.74%

-13.83%

FBT vs. BBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBT has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than BBC's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBT vs. BBC - Dividend Comparison

FBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBC
Virtus LifeSci Biotech Clinical Trials ETF
1.56%1.70%1.00%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.09%0.00%0.51%
FBT
First Trust Amex Biotechnology Index
0.00%0.00%0.71%0.00%0.00%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBT and BBC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBC has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to FBT (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBT dropped -40.51% vs BBC's -76.85%.

On 10-year performance, FBT leads with 8.86% vs 7.64% for BBC. On fees, FBT is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, FBT has been the lower-risk option at 6.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FBT has performed better with a 8.86% return vs 7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FBT is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BBC.

BBC has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for FBT.

FBT tracks NYSE Arca Biotechnology Index, while BBC tracks LifeSci Biotechnology Clinical Trials Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBT and 0.79% for BBC.

BBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBT and BBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer