FBOT vs. FBTC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. FBOT is actively managed, while FBTC is passively managed. Over the past year, FBOT returned 30.04% vs -43.57% for FBTC. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBOT charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FBTC.

Performance

FBOT vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBOT achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -31.72% return.

FBOT

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 12.72%
• 1Y: 30.04%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBTC

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: -21.11%
• YTD: -31.72%
• 6M: -31.53%
• 1Y: -43.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBOT vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	13.70%	19.15%	15.93%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	-31.72%	-6.56%	94.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FBOT and FBTC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.42

Return for Risk

FBOT vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBOT

FBOT Risk / Return Rank: 45
FBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 50

FBTC

FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 2
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBOT vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBOT	FBTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	-0.99	+2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	-1.45	+3.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.84	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	-0.83	+2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.65	-1.42	+9.07

FBOT vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBOT and FBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBOT vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBOT drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum FBTC drawdown of -52.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBOT and FBTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBOT	FBTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-52.44%	+28.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-52.44%	+37.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.68%	-52.44%	+46.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.12%	-16.83%	+11.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	30.72%	-26.78%

Volatility

FBOT vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT) is 8.13%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 13.34%. This indicates that FBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBOT	FBTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	13.34%	-5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.35%	34.52%	-17.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.40%	44.35%	-22.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	50.11%	-28.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	50.11%	-28.91%

FBOT vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBOT has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBOT vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

FBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF	0.44%	0.81%	0.31%	0.20%
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBOT and FBTC in my portfolio?

FBOT and FBTC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBOT or FBTC?

FBTC has higher volatility (13.34%) compared to FBOT (8.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBOT dropped -23.61% vs FBTC's -52.44%.

Which ETF is better, FBOT or FBTC?

On 1-year performance, FBOT leads with 30.04% vs -43.57% for FBTC. On fees, FBTC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBOT has been the lower-risk option at 8.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBOT or FBTC?

Over the 1-year period, FBOT has performed better with a 30.04% return vs -43.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBOT or FBTC?

FBTC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FBOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBOT or FBTC?

FBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for FBTC.

What is the main difference between FBOT and FBTC?

FBOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FBOT and 0.25% for FBTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.