FBNDX vs. CGDG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG).

FBNDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 6, 1971. CGDG is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Sep 26, 2023.

Performance

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	-0.36%	7.37%	0.93%	7.24%
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.58%	22.74%	11.52%	9.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBNDX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than CGDG's 1.58% return.

FBNDX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: 3.63%
• 3Y*: 3.61%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: 2.22%

CGDG

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 4.35%
• 1Y: 18.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBNDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDG's 0.47% expense ratio.

CGDG

Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF

FBNDX

Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund

Return for Risk

FBNDX vs. CGDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBNDX

FBNDX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FBNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FBNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FBNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FBNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FBNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

CGDG

CGDG Risk / Return Rank: 73
CGDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CGDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CGDG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CGDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
CGDG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBNDX	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.34	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	1.90	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.28	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	1.93	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	8.71	-4.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the CGDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBNDX and CGDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBNDX	CGDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	1.34	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.51	-0.98

Correlation

The correlation between FBNDX and CGDG is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Dividend Comparison

FBNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, more than CGDG's 1.94% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBNDX Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund	3.58%	3.87%	3.34%	3.56%	1.98%	1.34%	4.70%	2.75%	2.86%	2.18%	2.72%	2.66%
CGDG Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF	1.94%	1.95%	2.15%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBNDX drawdown since its inception was -42.76%, which is greater than CGDG's maximum drawdown of -10.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBNDX and CGDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBNDX	CGDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.76%	-10.52%	-32.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.88%	-9.90%	+7.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-4.61%	+2.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.37%	-1.29%	-9.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	2.19%	-1.19%

Volatility

FBNDX vs. CGDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Investment Grade Bond Fund (FBNDX) is 1.62%, while Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that FBNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBNDX	CGDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	4.64%	-3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	8.30%	-5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.62%	14.10%	-9.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.00%	12.22%	-6.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	12.22%	-7.22%