FBND vs. YCS
FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). FBND is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FBND returned 2.56%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for YCS. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
FBND vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return. Over the past 10 years, FBND has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 2.56%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
FBND
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
FBND vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and YCS is -0.52, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | -0.42 |
The correlation between FBND and YCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.42 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
YCS
FBND vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 3.97 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 12.40 | -6.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.92 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 1.12 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.65 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.33 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -49.56% | +32.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -8.30% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -23.05% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -27.32% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | -27.32% | +10.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | 0.00% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -19.93% | +16.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 2.66% | -1.78% |
Volatility
FBND vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is 1.27%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.75%. This indicates that FBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 2.75% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 12.32% | -9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 17.27% | -13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 21.10% | -15.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 19.01% | -12.91% |
FBND vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBND vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBND and YCS have a correlation of -0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YCS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FBND (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 12.34% vs 2.56% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
FBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBND and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer