FBND vs. LVHI
FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. FBND is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBND returned 0.68%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
FBND vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.45% return.
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and LVHI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.07 |
The correlation between FBND and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FBND vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBND
LVHI
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
FBND
LVHI
Utilities
FBND
LVHI
Energy
FBND
LVHI
Financial Services
FBND
LVHI
Basic Materials
FBND
-
LVHI
Communication Services
FBND
-
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
FBND
-
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
FBND
-
LVHI
Healthcare
FBND
-
LVHI
Real Estate
FBND
-
LVHI
Technology
FBND
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
LVHI
FBND vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.58 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 4.84 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 19.99 | -14.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 3.10 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 1.42 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.81 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -32.31% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -6.08% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -11.99% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -11.99% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -1.79% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -3.52% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 1.47% | -0.57% |
Volatility
FBND vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is 1.23%, while Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) has a volatility of 2.35%. This indicates that FBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 2.35% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 7.58% | -4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 9.50% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 11.07% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 13.76% | -7.66% |
FBND vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBND vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than LVHI's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBND and LVHI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.67% vs 0.68% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.72% for FBND.
FBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBND and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer