FBND vs. JBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while JBND is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBND returned 5.59% vs 5.68% for JBND. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JBND.

Performance

FBND vs. JBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than JBND's 0.22% return.

FBND

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: 0.30%
• 1Y: 5.59%
• 3Y*: 4.70%
• 5Y*: 0.83%
• 10Y*: 2.56%

JBND

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 5.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBND vs. JBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.50%	7.57%	2.13%	7.76%
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	0.22%	8.21%	3.19%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FBND and JBND is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023	0.95

The correlation between FBND and JBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBND vs. JBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBND	JBND
Industrials	71.4%	0.5%
Utilities	27.5%	0.7%
Energy	1.1%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	9.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.8%
Communication Services	-	25.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	3.1%
Real Estate	-	2.6%
Technology	-	19.7%

Return for Risk

FBND vs. JBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 39

JBND

JBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 39
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBND vs. JBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBND	JBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.49	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	2.23	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	1.94	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.37	5.97	+0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBND vs. JBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the JBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBND and JBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBND	JBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.49	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.53	-1.09

Drawdowns

FBND vs. JBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, which is greater than JBND's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and JBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBND	JBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.25%	-4.48%	-12.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-2.94%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-1.74%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-1.15%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	0.95%	-0.07%

Volatility

FBND vs. JBND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) at 1.20%. This indicates that FBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBND	JBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	1.20%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.73%	2.67%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	3.82%	+0.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	4.84%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.10%	4.84%	+1.26%

FBND vs. JBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than JBND's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBND vs. JBND - Dividend Comparison

FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than JBND's 4.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.70%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	4.41%	4.42%	4.58%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBND and JBND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FBND and JBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBND or JBND?

FBND has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to JBND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs JBND's -4.48%.

Which ETF is better, FBND or JBND?

On 1-year performance, JBND leads with 5.68% vs 5.59% for FBND. On fees, JBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBND or JBND?

Over the 1-year period, JBND has performed better with a 5.68% return vs 5.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBND or JBND?

JBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBND or JBND?

FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.

What is the main difference between FBND and JBND?

FBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while JBND is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 0.30% for JBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.