FBND vs. FLOT
FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FLOT is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. FBND is actively managed, while FLOT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FBND returned 2.47%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for FLOT. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLOT.
Performance
FBND vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FBND has underperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.03% annualized return.
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
FLOT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
FBND vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.87% | 4.91% | 6.53% | 6.43% | 1.28% | 0.45% | 0.87% | 3.97% | 1.48% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and FLOT is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
FLOT
FBND vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 3.22 | -1.98 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 11.27 | -9.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 104.83 | -98.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 6.54 | -5.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 2.38 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.73 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.66 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and FLOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -13.54% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -0.43% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -1.57% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -2.36% | -14.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | -13.54% | -3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.02% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -0.21% | -3.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.05% | +0.85% |
Volatility
FBND vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.20%. This indicates that FBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 0.20% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 0.62% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.80% | 0.75% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 1.77% | +4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 4.15% | +1.95% |
FBND vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBND vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than FLOT's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBND and FLOT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBND has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to FLOT (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs FLOT's -13.54%.
On 10-year performance, FLOT leads with 3.03% vs 2.47% for FBND. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 3.03% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.54% for FLOT.
FBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 0.15% for FLOT.
FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.54 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBND and FLOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer