FBND vs. FETH
FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. FBND is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Over the past year, FBND returned 5.59% vs -31.75% for FETH. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FETH.
Performance
FBND vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -39.45% return.
FBND
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
FETH
- 1D
- -5.78%
- 1M
- -23.67%
- YTD
- -39.45%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- -31.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBND vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.57% | 1.00% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -39.45% | -11.37% | -3.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and FETH is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
FETH
FBND vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.97 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | -0.51 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | -0.84 | +7.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | -0.47 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | -0.41 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -64.00% | +46.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -62.95% | +60.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -62.95% | +61.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -32.73% | +29.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 37.82% | -36.94% |
Volatility
FBND vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is 1.27%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that FBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 9.99% | -8.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 46.01% | -43.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 68.50% | -64.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 72.27% | -66.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 72.27% | -66.17% |
FBND vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBND vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBND and FETH have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (9.99%) compared to FBND (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs FETH's -64.00%.
On 1-year performance, FBND leads with 5.59% vs -31.75% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FBND has performed better with a 5.59% return vs -31.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
FBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 0.00% for FETH.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBND and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer