FBND vs. EUSB
FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) and EUSB (iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. FBND is actively managed, while EUSB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBND returned 0.83%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for EUSB. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBND charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for EUSB.
Performance
FBND vs. EUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBND achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than EUSB's 0.13% return.
FBND
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 2.56%
EUSB
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND vs. EUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 3.57% |
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 0.13% | 7.45% | 1.83% | 5.80% | -12.81% | -1.29% | 1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBND and EUSB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FBND and EUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBND vs. EUSB — Risk / Return Rank
FBND
EUSB
FBND vs. EUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 2.09 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | 6.26 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.45 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.06 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.04 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
FBND vs. EUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBND drawdown since its inception was -17.25%, roughly equal to the maximum EUSB drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBND and EUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -17.87% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -2.48% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -5.76% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.25% | -17.45% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.36% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -6.50% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.82% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FBND vs. EUSB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF (EUSB) at 1.17%. This indicates that FBND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBND | EUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.17% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 2.49% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 3.57% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.92% | 5.77% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 5.41% | +0.69% |
FBND vs. EUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than EUSB's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBND vs. EUSB - Dividend Comparison
FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than EUSB's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSB iShares ESG Advanced Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.97% | 3.84% | 3.67% | 3.08% | 2.21% | 1.10% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.70% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FBND and EUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FBND has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to EUSB (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBND dropped -17.25% vs EUSB's -17.87%.
On 5-year performance, FBND leads with 0.83% vs 0.34% for EUSB. On fees, EUSB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FBND has performed better with a 0.83% return vs 0.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EUSB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 3.97% for EUSB.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FBND and 0.12% for EUSB.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBND and EUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer