FBLEX vs. DDVCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX).
FBLEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012. DDVCX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
FBLEX vs. DDVCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBLEX vs. DDVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund | -2.01% | 17.06% | 18.04% | 15.60% | -4.82% | 26.83% | 4.34% | 25.57% | -9.04% | 12.38% |
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 0.79% | 9.95% | 5.68% | 1.06% | -4.57% | 20.87% | -0.63% | 19.33% | -3.92% | 12.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBLEX achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than DDVCX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FBLEX has outperformed DDVCX with an annualized return of 11.11%, while DDVCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
FBLEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
DDVCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBLEX vs. DDVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBLEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DDVCX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBLEX vs. DDVCX — Risk / Return Rank
FBLEX
DDVCX
FBLEX vs. DDVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBLEX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.75 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.13 | +0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.16 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.86 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 3.35 | +1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBLEX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.75 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.32 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.41 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.37 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBLEX and DDVCX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FBLEX vs. DDVCX - Dividend Comparison
FBLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.33%, less than DDVCX's 26.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund | 11.33% | 9.95% | 12.63% | 5.05% | 12.66% | 14.51% | 3.85% | 5.65% | 10.97% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 13.81% |
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 26.23% | 26.55% | 30.88% | 10.78% | 9.46% | 23.96% | 1.92% | 4.13% | 5.29% | 3.08% | 1.57% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
FBLEX vs. DDVCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBLEX drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, smaller than the maximum DDVCX drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBLEX and DDVCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBLEX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.73% | -54.29% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -11.60% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.00% | -18.71% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.73% | -37.60% | -2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.89% | -8.59% | +1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -9.07% | +5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 3.11% | -0.62% |
Volatility
FBLEX vs. DDVCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) is 3.48%, while Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that FBLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBLEX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 3.92% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 8.77% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.13% | 16.13% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 14.49% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 17.04% | +0.35% |