FBKFX vs. POOL
FBKFX (Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund) is Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Fidelity, while POOL (Pool Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FBKFX returned 10.18%/yr vs -15.08%/yr for POOL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FBKFX vs. POOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBKFX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than POOL's -19.95% return.
FBKFX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.85%
- 1Y
- 25.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- —
POOL
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -10.43%
- YTD
- -19.95%
- 6M
- -25.55%
- 1Y
- -39.50%
- 3Y*
- -16.55%
- 5Y*
- -15.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
FBKFX vs. POOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBKFX Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund | 10.64% | 15.68% | 16.19% | 21.93% | -17.87% | 18.51% | 22.38% | 10.57% |
POOL Pool Corporation | -19.95% | -31.81% | -13.39% | 33.51% | -46.03% | 52.98% | 76.95% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBKFX and POOL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FBKFX and POOL has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBKFX vs. POOL — Risk / Return Rank
FBKFX
POOL
FBKFX vs. POOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Pool Corporation (POOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBKFX | POOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.02 | -1.19 | +4.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.25 | -1.75 | +6.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 0.79 | +0.79 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | -0.85 | +4.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.31 | -1.57 | +20.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBKFX | POOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | -1.19 | +4.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | -0.45 | +1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.57 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
FBKFX vs. POOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBKFX drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum POOL drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKFX and POOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBKFX | POOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -75.71% | +49.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.61% | -46.86% | +40.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.88% | -56.77% | +43.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.64% | -67.85% | +45.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -66.63% | +66.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -18.32% | +13.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 25.15% | -23.79% |
Volatility
FBKFX vs. POOL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) is 2.65%, while Pool Corporation (POOL) has a volatility of 11.00%. This indicates that FBKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBKFX | POOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 11.00% | -8.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.98% | 26.09% | -19.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.74% | 33.30% | -24.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.26% | 33.87% | -21.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 31.52% | -17.35% |
Dividends
FBKFX vs. POOL - Dividend Comparison
FBKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than POOL's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBKFX Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund | 5.63% | 6.23% | 2.86% | 1.79% | 3.54% | 4.14% | 2.22% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POOL Pool Corporation | 2.79% | 2.16% | 1.38% | 1.08% | 1.26% | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.99% | 1.16% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBKFX and POOL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POOL has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to FBKFX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBKFX dropped -26.58% vs POOL's -75.71%.
FBKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBKFX and POOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer