PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBKFX vs. POOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBKFX vs. POOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Pool Corporation (POOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBKFX achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than POOL's -19.95% return.


FBKFX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.20%
YTD
10.64%
6M
10.85%
1Y
25.80%
3Y*
17.62%
5Y*
10.18%
10Y*

POOL

1D
0.61%
1M
-10.43%
YTD
-19.95%
6M
-25.55%
1Y
-39.50%
3Y*
-16.55%
5Y*
-15.08%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBKFX vs. POOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FBKFX
Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund
10.64%15.68%16.19%21.93%-17.87%18.51%22.38%10.57%
POOL
Pool Corporation
-19.95%-31.81%-13.39%33.51%-46.03%52.98%76.95%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FBKFX and POOL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FBKFX and POOL has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBKFX vs. POOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBKFX
FBKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FBKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FBKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

POOL
POOL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
POOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
POOL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
POOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
POOL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBKFX vs. POOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Pool Corporation (POOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBKFXPOOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.02

-1.19

+4.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.25

-1.75

+6.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

0.79

+0.79

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

-0.85

+4.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.31

-1.57

+20.89

FBKFX vs. POOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBKFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the POOL Sharpe Ratio of -1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBKFX and POOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBKFXPOOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

-1.19

+4.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

-0.45

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.57

+0.38

Drawdowns

FBKFX vs. POOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBKFX drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum POOL drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKFX and POOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBKFXPOOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-75.71%

+49.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-46.86%

+40.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.88%

-56.77%

+43.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-67.85%

+45.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-66.63%

+66.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-18.32%

+13.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

25.15%

-23.79%

Volatility

FBKFX vs. POOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) is 2.65%, while Pool Corporation (POOL) has a volatility of 11.00%. This indicates that FBKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBKFXPOOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

11.00%

-8.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

26.09%

-19.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

33.30%

-24.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

33.87%

-21.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

31.52%

-17.35%

Dividends

FBKFX vs. POOL - Dividend Comparison

FBKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than POOL's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBKFX
Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund
5.63%6.23%2.86%1.79%3.54%4.14%2.22%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POOL
Pool Corporation
2.79%2.16%1.38%1.08%1.26%0.53%0.61%0.99%1.16%1.10%1.14%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBKFX and POOL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POOL has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to FBKFX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBKFX dropped -26.58% vs POOL's -75.71%.

FBKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBKFX and POOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer