FBKFX vs. POOL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Pool Corporation (POOL).

FBKFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 14, 2019.

Performance

FBKFX vs. POOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Pool Corporation (POOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBKFX vs. POOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FBKFX Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund	-3.81%	15.68%	16.19%	21.93%	-17.87%	18.51%	22.38%	10.57%
POOL Pool Corporation	-11.02%	-31.81%	-13.39%	33.51%	-46.03%	52.98%	76.95%	12.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBKFX achieves a -3.81% return, which is significantly higher than POOL's -11.02% return.

FBKFX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -5.92%
• YTD: -3.81%
• 6M: -0.75%
• 1Y: 14.36%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: —

POOL

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -10.41%
• YTD: -11.02%
• 6M: -34.03%
• 1Y: -35.24%
• 3Y*: -14.84%
• 5Y*: -9.33%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FBKFX vs. POOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBKFX

FBKFX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FBKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FBKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FBKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FBKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FBKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

POOL

POOL Risk / Return Rank: 6
POOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
POOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
POOL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
POOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
POOL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBKFX vs. POOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Pool Corporation (POOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBKFX	POOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-1.03	+2.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	-1.47	+3.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.82	+0.45
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	-0.87	+2.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.56	-1.78	+9.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBKFX vs. POOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBKFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the POOL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBKFX and POOL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBKFX	POOL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	-1.03	+2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	-0.28	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.58	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FBKFX and POOL is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FBKFX vs. POOL - Dividend Comparison

FBKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than POOL's 2.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBKFX Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund	6.48%	6.23%	2.86%	1.79%	3.54%	4.14%	2.22%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
POOL Pool Corporation	2.47%	2.16%	1.38%	1.08%	1.26%	0.53%	0.61%	0.99%	1.16%	1.10%	1.14%	1.24%

Drawdowns

FBKFX vs. POOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBKFX drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum POOL drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKFX and POOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBKFX	POOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.58%	-75.71%	+49.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-39.78%	+31.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	-63.57%	+40.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.57%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-62.91%	+56.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-18.07%	+13.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	19.36%	-17.61%

Volatility

FBKFX vs. POOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) is 3.54%, while Pool Corporation (POOL) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that FBKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBKFX	POOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	6.56%	-3.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.60%	24.10%	-17.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.90%	34.42%	-22.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.22%	33.62%	-21.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	31.24%	-16.99%