FBKFX vs. FBGRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FBKFX (Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund) and FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FBKFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Fidelity, while FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FBKFX returned 9.91%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for FBGRX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FBKFX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FBGRX.

Performance

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBKFX achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.19% return.

FBKFX

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 6M: 10.39%
• 1Y: 24.82%
• 3Y*: 17.44%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

FBGRX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 7.83%
• YTD: 18.19%
• 6M: 19.03%
• 1Y: 43.35%
• 3Y*: 32.41%
• 5Y*: 16.66%
• 10Y*: 21.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FBKFX Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund	10.12%	15.68%	16.19%	21.93%	-17.87%	18.51%	22.38%	10.57%
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	18.19%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FBKFX and FBGRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019	0.91

The correlation between FBKFX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBKFX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBKFX

FBKFX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FBKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FBKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FBKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FBKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
FBKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBKFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	2.57	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.09	3.31	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.44	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	3.54	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.58	14.99	+3.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBKFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBKFX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBKFX	FBGRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.90	2.57	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.67	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.68	+0.26

Drawdowns

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBKFX drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKFX and FBGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBKFX	FBGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.58%	-58.64%	+32.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.61%	-12.65%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.88%	-27.07%	+14.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.64%	-43.08%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.31%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-12.53%	+7.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.36%	2.98%	-1.62%

Volatility

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund (FBKFX) is 2.70%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that FBKFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBKFX	FBGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	4.19%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.99%	13.01%	-6.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.76%	17.43%	-8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.26%	24.88%	-12.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.17%	23.68%	-9.51%

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBKFX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBKFX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FBKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.61%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FBKFX Fidelity Balanced K6 Fund	5.65%	6.23%	2.86%	1.79%	3.54%	4.14%	2.22%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBKFX and FBGRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FBKFX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBKFX or FBGRX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to FBKFX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBKFX dropped -26.58% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.