PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBIOX vs. FHLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio (FBIOX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBIOX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's -3.90% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FBIOX having a 9.09% annualized return and FHLC not far ahead at 9.14%.


FBIOX

1D
-3.67%
1M
-3.79%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
42.15%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
9.09%

FHLC

1D
0.82%
1M
1.50%
YTD
-3.90%
6M
-4.11%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBIOX
Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio
0.03%36.38%7.26%10.09%-15.87%-12.26%38.62%36.12%-10.92%27.87%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
-3.90%15.42%2.48%2.58%-5.55%20.39%18.13%21.94%4.71%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FBIOX and FHLC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.76

The correlation between FBIOX and FHLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBIOX
FHLC

Healthcare

100.0%
99.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FBIOX
100.0%
FHLC
99.6%

Basic Materials

FBIOX

-

FHLC

-

Communication Services

FBIOX

-

FHLC

-

Consumer Cyclical

FBIOX

-

FHLC

-

Consumer Defensive

FBIOX

-

FHLC

-

Energy

FBIOX

-

FHLC

-

Financial Services

FBIOX

-

FHLC
0.1%

Industrials

FBIOX

-

FHLC
0.0%

Real Estate

FBIOX

-

FHLC

-

Technology

FBIOX

-

FHLC
0.0%

Utilities

FBIOX

-

FHLC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBIOX vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBIOX
FBIOX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FBIOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBIOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBIOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FBIOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBIOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLC
FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio (FBIOX) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBIOXFHLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.01

+1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

1.58

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.81

1.40

+4.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.24

3.52

+14.72

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBIOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the FHLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBIOX and FHLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBIOXFHLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.01

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.30

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.55

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.61

-0.13

Drawdowns

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBIOX drawdown since its inception was -71.98%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBIOX and FHLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBIOXFHLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.98%

-28.76%

-43.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-10.38%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

-16.87%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.87%

-17.73%

-27.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.66%

-28.76%

-19.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-6.96%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.63%

-5.19%

-18.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

4.11%

-1.69%

Volatility

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio (FBIOX) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.05%. This indicates that FBIOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBIOXFHLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

4.05%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.31%

10.11%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.71%

14.33%

+6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.96%

14.97%

+9.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.25%

16.81%

+9.44%

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBIOX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBIOX vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison

FBIOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than FHLC's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBIOX
Fidelity Select Biotechnology Portfolio
6.72%2.47%1.21%0.45%0.00%14.48%19.46%8.89%11.18%1.41%3.42%6.71%
FHLC
Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF
1.43%1.40%1.51%1.40%1.30%1.16%1.45%1.18%1.38%1.38%1.40%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBIOX and FHLC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBIOX has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to FHLC (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBIOX dropped -71.98% vs FHLC's -28.76%.

FBIOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBIOX and FHLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer