FBGKX vs. AAPL
FBGKX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FBGKX returned 21.39%/yr vs 29.63%/yr for AAPL. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FBGKX vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBGKX achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FBGKX has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 21.39%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.63% annualized return.
FBGKX
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 37.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.64%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 21.39%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
FBGKX vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K | 13.60% | 19.99% | 39.87% | 55.76% | -38.40% | 22.74% | 62.35% | 33.56% | 1.11% | 36.08% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBGKX and AAPL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2008 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FBGKX and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBGKX vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
FBGKX
AAPL
FBGKX vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBGKX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.53 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 8.89 | +4.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBGKX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.18 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.71 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 1.03 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.44 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
FBGKX vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBGKX drawdown since its inception was -48.90%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGKX and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBGKX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.90% | -81.80% | +32.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | -13.80% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.06% | -33.36% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.03% | -33.36% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.03% | -38.52% | -4.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.21% | -4.33% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -29.60% | +21.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 5.48% | -2.49% |
Volatility
FBGKX vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) and Apple Inc (AAPL) have volatilities of 5.92% and 5.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBGKX | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 5.68% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.72% | 15.99% | -2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 22.41% | -4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 27.47% | -2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.71% | 28.91% | -5.20% |
Dividends
FBGKX vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
FBGKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K | 1.66% | 1.89% | 6.00% | 0.93% | 0.56% | 8.77% | 6.41% | 3.70% | 6.41% | 4.26% | 4.22% | 5.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBGKX and AAPL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBGKX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGKX dropped -48.90% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBGKX and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer