FBDC vs. RSPF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) and RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. FBDC is actively managed, while RSPF is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBDC charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPF.

Performance

FBDC vs. RSPF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -9.51% return, which is significantly lower than RSPF's -5.25% return.

FBDC

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: -7.81%
• YTD: -9.51%
• 6M: -10.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPF

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -5.25%
• 6M: -2.72%
• 1Y: 2.40%
• 3Y*: 15.99%
• 5Y*: 5.36%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDC vs. RSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	-9.51%	-2.43%
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	-5.25%	3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and RSPF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.56

Return for Risk

FBDC vs. RSPF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPF

RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 10
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDC vs. RSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBDC	RSPF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.70	0.21	-0.91

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. RSPF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum RSPF drawdown of -81.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and RSPF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBDC	RSPF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-81.32%	+60.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.13%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.24%	-7.99%	-9.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.14%	-19.04%	+8.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBDC	RSPF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.35%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.06%	15.05%	+3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.06%	19.85%	-1.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	22.91%	-4.85%

FBDC vs. RSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPF's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBDC vs. RSPF - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.52%, more than RSPF's 1.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	11.52%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF	1.70%	1.55%	1.65%	2.16%	1.95%	1.56%	2.24%	1.85%	2.51%	1.28%	37.55%	2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBDC and RSPF in my portfolio?

FBDC and RSPF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBDC or RSPF?

On fees, RSPF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBDC or RSPF?

RSPF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBDC or RSPF?

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 1.70% for RSPF.

What is the main difference between FBDC and RSPF?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.40% for RSPF.