PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDC vs. BSCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBDC vs. BSCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -9.51% return, which is significantly lower than BSCT's 0.57% return.


FBDC

1D
-2.98%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
-9.51%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BSCT

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.81%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
5.61%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDC vs. BSCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and BSCT is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBDC vs. BSCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDC

BSCT
BSCT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BSCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDC vs. BSCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBDC vs. BSCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBDCBSCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

0.32

-1.02

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. BSCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, which is greater than BSCT's maximum drawdown of -19.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and BSCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDCBSCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-19.14%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.24%

-0.53%

-16.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.14%

-5.37%

-4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

Volatility

FBDC vs. BSCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBDCBSCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

2.31%

+15.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.06%

5.71%

+12.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

7.26%

+10.80%

FBDC vs. BSCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBDC vs. BSCT - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.52%, more than BSCT's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSCT
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.57%4.53%4.51%3.89%2.65%1.94%2.24%0.86%
FBDC
FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF
11.52%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBDC and BSCT have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BSCT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSCT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 4.57% for BSCT.

FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while BSCT is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.10% for BSCT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBDC and BSCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer