PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDAX vs. MDVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDAX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than MDVAX's 2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FBDAX has underperformed MDVAX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while MDVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.22% annualized return.


FBDAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.60%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.10%
10Y*
1.75%

MDVAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.59%
6M
2.58%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBDAX
Franklin Total Return Fund
0.57%7.17%2.00%6.00%-14.70%-0.59%7.39%9.78%-1.56%3.71%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.59%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%8.08%10.12%-1.55%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FBDAX and MDVAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1999

0.84

The correlation between FBDAX and MDVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBDAX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDAX
FBDAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FBDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FBDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBDAXMDVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.53

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.82

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

16.10

-10.17

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the MDVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBDAX and MDVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBDAXMDVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.58

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.06

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.42

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.71

+0.17

Drawdowns

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDAX drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum MDVAX drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDAX and MDVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDAXMDVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.02%

-23.02%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-2.21%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-5.44%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.02%

-23.02%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.02%

-23.02%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-3.38%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-3.47%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.52%

+0.45%

Volatility

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that FBDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBDAXMDVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

0.95%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

2.18%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

3.29%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.84%

6.46%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.09%

5.27%

-0.18%

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBDAX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison

FBDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than MDVAX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBDAX
Franklin Total Return Fund
4.53%4.37%4.05%3.36%3.56%2.48%3.18%4.12%3.03%2.30%1.85%3.56%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.99%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBDAX and MDVAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBDAX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to MDVAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBDAX dropped -20.02% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBDAX and MDVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer