FBDAX vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
FBDAX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Aug 3, 1998. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
FBDAX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBDAX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDAX Franklin Total Return Fund | -0.82% | 7.17% | 2.00% | 6.00% | -14.70% | -0.59% | 7.39% | 9.78% | -1.56% | 3.71% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 20.88% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBDAX achieves a -0.82% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, FBDAX has underperformed EMO with an annualized return of 1.74%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.
FBDAX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
EMO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBDAX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBDAX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FBDAX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
FBDAX
EMO
FBDAX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBDAX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.91 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.28 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.07 | +0.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 3.23 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBDAX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.91 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 1.25 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.12 | +0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBDAX and EMO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FBDAX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
FBDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, less than EMO's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBDAX Franklin Total Return Fund | 4.13% | 4.37% | 4.05% | 3.36% | 3.56% | 2.48% | 3.18% | 4.12% | 3.03% | 2.30% | 1.85% | 3.56% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.11% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
FBDAX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBDAX drawdown since its inception was -20.02%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDAX and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBDAX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.02% | -95.06% | +75.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -18.81% | +15.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.02% | -28.59% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.02% | -93.02% | +73.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -2.55% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -32.27% | +29.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 6.22% | -5.30% |
Volatility
FBDAX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Total Return Fund (FBDAX) is 1.56%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that FBDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBDAX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.56% | 4.63% | -3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 11.12% | -8.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.39% | 21.39% | -17.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 26.78% | -20.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.06% | 41.41% | -36.35% |